Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is making headlines with his recent legal actions against China and Starbucks. His office announced plans to seize assets from China to enforce a $24.5 billion judgment related to COVID-19. This lawsuit, originally filed by his predecessor, Eric Schmitt, claims that China’s actions during the pandemic harmed Missouri by hoarding personal protective equipment. While the legal battle is significant, some believe Bailey’s actions are more about political messaging than actually collecting money.
In a separate case, Bailey has also sued Starbucks, alleging that the coffee chain discriminates against white men in its hiring practices. This lawsuit comes in the wake of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to end diversity and inclusion programs in federal agencies. Bailey argues that Starbucks’ policies create quotas that limit the hiring of white males, which he claims violates both state and federal laws.
Bailey’s aggressive legal strategy reflects a growing trend among state attorneys general who are increasingly involved in national political issues. Over the past decade, these officials have taken on roles as advocates for various causes, often challenging the federal government. This shift began in the 1990s when attorneys general successfully sued tobacco companies, showcasing their potential to influence national policy.
Critics of Bailey’s lawsuits suggest they are merely grandstanding. However, these legal actions can have significant political benefits. For instance, Democratic Attorney General Josh Shapiro leveraged his lawsuits against the Trump administration to win the Pennsylvania governor’s race in 2022. Similarly, Bailey’s predecessors in Missouri have transitioned from state attorney general roles to U.S. Senate positions, indicating that these legal battles can serve as a stepping stone to higher office.
Bailey has also targeted other issues beyond China and Starbucks. His office has challenged various Biden administration policies, including immigration and environmental regulations. He has even threatened private gyms over bathroom policies and sued New York state over what he describes as interference in Missouri’s electoral processes.
As Bailey continues to pursue these high-profile lawsuits, he emphasizes that they are necessary to uphold the rule of law. His office claims that progressive politicians have abandoned legal standards, forcing them to take action. Whether these lawsuits will yield tangible results or simply serve as political fodder remains to be seen, but they certainly keep Bailey in the public eye.